It wasnt that I didnt want a realistic army containing regiments which fought at specific battles, just the information was in very short supply. I loved the uniforms of the Irish Legion and the 7th 'Africa' Neopolitan line regiment, so they were included in my army, Corsican Light Infantry, got them, Romana's Spanish Division, yep painted them to.
It didnt bother me that these were seriously second rate units in reality, they were pretty and were in the Blandford's.
Eventually as more information became available I replaced these units and finally changed scales, to replace them with accurate regiments, brigades and divisions. Accuracy was paramount. I would research every corps of my growing armies and make certain that it contained the correctly painted regiments.
For years I chased this 'wargamers Holy Grail' as if the accuracy was the most important thing in my hobby. However as in most things in life, you go full circle and with my latest small project I have returned to collecting and painting historical units that bear absolutely no relation to the brigades they actually fought with. I just want an eclectic mix of the exotic, famous and quirky. Hence the Tiger Zouaves. Colourful, short lived and probably not that effective, but what the hell.
I am now painting up Coppens Zouaves to complete my first brigade of the project. Probably not too historical, but they are great to paint. The Tigers are a mix of metal and plastic Perry figures.
The initial brigade, minus the unpainted cavalry movement trays [ for Neil ]
Looks great, not my period but very nice, my nephew is painting ACW both sides, so I guess I'll be playing with them. Lovely brown uniform and why not paint what you fancy, your not making a documentary.
ReplyDeleteBest Iain
Good analogy Iain,
DeleteIts strange how in the 1980's and 1990's wargamers were hung up on accuracy, as some sort of goal that would somehow make your wargame more relevant.
Very pretty units! Agreed. 100% accuracy, in painting and assembling a wargames army, to say nothing of writing one's own rules (or attempting to do so) that accurately simulate the battles o a given period, is, in the end, a fruitless exercise. Attractive, quirky, unique, and fun are far preferable in both cases.
ReplyDeleteBest Regards,
Stokes
One cant beat a quirky unit, and lets be correct the ACW had its fair share of fanciful units.
DeleteBravo! I took exactly the same approach - "so what" that they may not be entirely accurate, "sod 'em", say I..... :o)
ReplyDeletehttp://steve-the-wargamer.blogspot.com/2011/09/first-louisiana-special-battalion.html
Thanks Steve,
DeleteI think when I started to 'do' old school wargaming that I realised all over again it shouldnt be a problem.
What a wonderful look! The Tiger Zouaves are favorites of mine for appearance. Have you tried the Iron Brigade? While somewhat muted in appearance by comparison their Hardee hats and frock coats give them a unique appearance.
ReplyDeleteJerry
Jerry,
DeleteI am one of those sad individuals who likes 'whimsy'so when I start painting some Union troops I think there will be a few hardee hats, but also some havelocks to brighten things up.
Berdan's Sharpshooters? Now they would look good!
DeleteAnd you know what Robbie it's only taken us 40 years to realise it doesn't matter 😄 It's a great hobby and our armies are ours to game with and enjoy. Does it really matter we're not quite spot on with brigade and division composition?
ReplyDeleteLovely unit and really enjoying your ACW project
Graham,
Deletebeing retired and getting older can be a liberating thing,... so maybe wargaming naturism next eh?
They're lush! And I agree wholeheartedly with you.
ReplyDeleteColin,
Delete+1 for wild charges?
Why not!
DeleteGreat unit. I have the Tigers also (Old Glory figures) and I chose it for the same reasons! Quirky and colourful. They always attract a lot of attention (gunfire) on the table.
ReplyDeleteI fully expect them to rout on their first appearance.
Delete